It goes without saying that banks have an abundance of data. It is the job of the fraud analysts and investigators to sift through various bits of data to find anomalies and resolve fraudulent activity. These fraud subject-matter-experts usually can develop their own ad-hoc queries to find the information they are looking for. Surely, with access to disparate data and the ability to run queries, they can uncover fraud without deploying someone else’s software….right?

Most of the time, the answer is a resounding “no”. Very few banks have ...

Bank Technology News (BTN) ran an article on the first of the year entitled “9 Trends Reshaping Risk Software”, and Trend 8, “The bringing together of different risk systems”, caught my eye (being a fraud guy). My observation over the years is that centralized / consolidated vs. decentralized/ siloed is a cyclical thing. The idea of consolidating and centralizing keeps coming back, so that tells me it is generally considered to be a good idea. One explanation for the cycle swinging the other way might be the technical issues associated with implementing the consolidated model. A common data model goes a long way toward resolving many technical issues and systems that run disparate solutions on a single data model are promising for the consolidated approach.

In a recent Bank Info Security article, Account Takeover: Better or Worse?, Tracy Kitten interviews Doug Johnson, Vice President of Risk Management Policy for the American Bankers Association to get his expert opinion on the state of account takeovers and identity theft.

ACH fraud may be defined as many different fraud types including account takeover and payments fraud. Because there are no statistics on the total ACH losses for 2011, there may be the illusion that losses are down. In my opinion, the trend may seem that ACH fraud is decreasing due to tighter controls, but when I speak with industry colleagues, I tend to hear the opposite.

Committing bank fraud is easy when you have help on the inside. That’s what the prosecutors in the UK think happened in a $2m fraud scheme involving high net worth accounts. Between July and September 2008, a gang lead by Neil Wynne targeted Barclays Bank branches throughout the middle of England. Prosecutors believe that the gang had help from a bank employee as they had an uncanny knack for picking the best accounts to target. They also had no problem overcoming the bank’s security procedures. They just can’t prove that an employee was involved – at least not yet.

Here’s the scheme… With a fake passport in hand, one member of the gang pretended to be the owner of an existing, well-funded, Barclay’s Bank account. A second member of the gang posed as the accountholder’s partner.

Once the new account was opened, the gang proceeded to ...