Memento provides next-generation technology and solutions that enable financial institutions to rethink and improve the way they combat fraud and manage compliance. Memento customers realize unmatched business value and rapid ROI.

bank fraud forum

Fraudsters unite! A look at the rise of collusive fraud networks

April 22, 2009 by Mike Mulholand
4 comment(s)

Field evidence and industry reports point toward one clear fact fraud is becoming a team sport. More fraud is committed by teams of pros working together to commit fraud. And that's bad news for banks.

Why? Because teams can generate larger, more damaging fraud losses. Their schemes tend to be more sophisticated and better-planned than the work of fraudsters working alone on quick-hit attacks. Their work can be harder to detect. And collusive fraud covers all fraud types from new account fraud to employee fraud. A lot of times, it means cross-channel fraud, and most banks struggle to find it, much less shut it down completely.

Consider these recent stories:

It's clear that organized crime doesn't mean bands of goodfellas, though there is some evidence that traditional organized crime figures are in the game as well, especially Eastern European. Fraudsters may simply share a country of origin, zip code, cell phone number, computer, or neighborhood. It appears that they may be loosely related, and groups change in their makeup over time. Regardless of how they are connected, they need to control their fraud operations, and in the process may do suspicious things like change their address right after opening an account. They may reveal sketchy access patterns, like multiple accounts accessed from the same IP address or phone. Open multiple accounts with the same funding source or make suspicious deposits or withdrawals. But they all want one thing-your customer's money.

So what can be done? Addressing the problem of collusive fraud requires identifying high-risk groups, detecting and linking suspicious clusters of accounts, and shutting them down-early and thoroughly. A partial shutdown can tip off remaining fraudsters causing them to execute their plan enmasse, racking up even more losses.

Collusive behavior accounts for nearly 50% of new account fraud.More sophisticated schemes like on-line account takeover are often performed by organized fraudsters (from virtually anywhere in the world). New account fraud detection strategies need to be focused on protecting your bank from organized fraudsters. Only then can you protect your customer base from victimization and your bank from eroding profits. Fraud is a business. When the going gets tough, the tough get together. They figure out how to exploit your policies and loopholes. And they pool their collective fraud smarts to get to the money.


Make a Comment

* = Required
*
*
*
*
 

Recent Comments:

jimwes
April 23, 2009 - 7:34 AM
"Good article! There can be no doubt that collusive fraud is rising like a rocket in business and government. Within any organization collusion defeats internal control. This is going to require some new approaches by fraud auditors and examiners and much greater precautions in designing controls. "
Uzzy
April 27, 2009 - 7:38 AM
"Well it is only to be expected that sole traders merge and pool knowledge and expertise to grow their companies. We all need to see fraudsters as employees belonging to a competitor. To be successful we need to not necessarily outsmart them but to close a few doors which makes a competitor with weaker controls and checks their target. Remember this is their day job - if it gets difficult they do not give up they look for other avenues or easier targets. If there are none then they will increase investment and sophistication to keep on attacking you. "
192Laura
April 27, 2009 - 8:10 AM
"Excellent article, and proves that fraudsters are not always teenage 'geeks' trying their luck; they are organised, smart and they communicate. 192 have developed a fraud forum and data sharing tool for this very reason; if fraudsters share information so successfully, then why shouldn't that extend to those working in the fraud prevention profession? The National Fraud Reporting Centre will help to improve the situation, but we would urge all those businesses, in banking, retail, etc who encounter fraud to join a fraud data sharing scheme. "
Mikem
May 12, 2009 - 1:40 PM
"jimwes makes a good point about controls. Many frauds you see perpetrated can be traced back to the failure of a control (especially internal fraud) In an earlier post, Don't Let Fraudsters Steal New Revenue, I hinted in the last sentence that marketing and Risk management should work tgether. This is where I was going with that. If risk folks were involved in designing controls in products and processes, there would be a favorable impact on the vulnerability to fraud. After all, the risk guys are the ones who see the results. "