Memento provides next-generation technology and solutions that enable financial institutions to rethink and improve the way they combat fraud and manage compliance. Memento customers realize unmatched business value and rapid ROI.

bank fraud forum

The Time Has Come

December 11, 2009 by Mike Braatz
2 comment(s)

Over the past several weeks, you may have noticed that the problem of check fraud has received a lot of attention here on the Bank Fraud Forum. Why, you may ask, are we paying so much attention to this crusty old problem? We thought it was important to shine the spotlight on check fraud, not only because it continues to be a major loss area, but also because it's an interesting problem to consider.

Check fraud has been around seemingly forever. Every fraud prevention professional I know has their own collection of statistics,

and eye-popping anecdotes about check fraud. And yet, despite this vast collective knowledge of and experience with the issue, it's not going away any time soon. Check volumes may be trending down, but check fraud is definitely on the rise. Why is this?

For the most part, current approaches to fighting check fraud seem to be stuck in a bygone era. Overly simplistic fraud filters – whether they be manual or automated – spew out mostly false positive alerts, leaving overworked teams of analysts to comb through the wreckage looking for clues (in this case, the clues are the real fraud). The bittersweet result (on a macro scale, anyway) is that this approach does catch fraud, leading some banks and credit unions to believe they've got the problem under control. Perhaps but at what cost? And what types of more complex, cross-channel fraud – where bad checks are just one aspect of the scheme – are not being caught? For example, credit card "bust out" scams in which bad checks are used to pay off outstanding balances, freeing up the credit line for even more fraudulent charges. Check fraud is part of this, but is it being categorized as such?

In this day and age, we as an industry should have few excuses for not controlling a problem like check fraud. And do so at a reasonable cost! That second part is important, because as check fraud continues to grow, it's unlikely financial institutions can continue to throw manpower at the problem like they're doing today. It's time for modern analytical approaches and the latest technology to catch up with this age old problem.

At Memento, we like to think we're pitching in to be part of the solution. This week we announced our next generation check fraud solution. And while this isn't the forum to make our sales pitch, we invite you to hear from our experts and learn more about the investments we're making to help solve the problem of check fraud. If interested, you can read a check fraud white paper, register to attend a check fraud webinar, or even watch a brief check fraud solution video-demo. We'd really appreciate your feedback and ideas for helping us solve the problem.


Make a Comment

* = Required
*
*
*
*
 

Recent Comments:

Michael Bacon
December 14, 2009 - 8:30 AM
"In the UK proposals to eradicate cheques (as we spell them) have resurfaced. This has produced a goodly number of protests from across the spectrum of customers and (small) businesses, charities, etc. The banks would like to remove cheques from their portfolio of transaction methods, even though they make considerable sums through accruing interest in the five or so days they claim it takes to clear such instruments. As part of the removal of cheques as a means of payment, the 24 bank and building society members of the UK Domestic Cheque Guarantee Card Scheme have announced that the Scheme will close on 30th June 2011, meaning that it will no longer be possible to guarantee a cheque under the Scheme after this date. This will place receivers of cheques at risk if the transaction is fraudulent. Nevertheless, there are a great many small organisations and individuals who cannot easily change to accepting card payments. I strongly suspect that, as a consequence, the number of cash transactions will rise. This will probably have the "unintended consequence" of reducing the tax take for government, as more people pay small traders in "folding stuff". What it will do for the fraud figures is anybody's guess, but muggings and burglaries might welll increase. "
Mike Braatz
December 14, 2009 - 2:24 PM
"Michael - Thanks for the great insight into the thinking in the UK. Like you, I can foresee many ripple effects from the 1) elimination of cheque guarantees, and/or 2) eradication of the payment method altogether. The irony is that check (and cheque) fraud prevention methods will be needed more than ever, even as their use declines quickly. "