Memento provides next-generation technology and solutions that enable financial institutions to rethink and improve the way they combat fraud and manage compliance. Memento customers realize unmatched business value and rapid ROI.

bank fraud forum

The Value of Fraud Prevention

June 2, 2009 by Shirley Inscoe
2 comment(s)

Fraud prevention is vitally important to the well being of financial institutions of all sizes. If you don't believe that you haven't been paying attention.

Just fifteen years ago, only the larger financial institutions had to be concerned with fraud; many smaller ones "knew their customers” and didn't experience fraud. The world is really changing" Individual fraudsters, fraud rings, even bad employees are no longer solely the problem of large financial institutions. Recent ABA studies have shown that fraud is steadily moving into smaller banks, perhaps in part because large banks have implemented so many fraud prevention systems. Smaller banks and credit unions are largely unprotected, and with an emphasis on deposit growth, may unwittingly let fraudsters in along with good new customers.

So what is the value in fraud prevention? It takes many forms and varies greatly depending on the size of the institution. With many large banks now using an industry database to prescreen applicants and avoid hiring each others' bad former employees, where do you think all those thieves are going to look for work? Their skills are in financial services, so small institutions beware! What's more, smaller banks and credit unions are at greater risk if hit with a multi-million dollar loss, be it internal or external fraud. Due to their size, they just can't recover from such a loss as easily as larger banks.

Although, large banks can ill afford extraordinary losses such as these either, especially in this economy. And, yet, all it takes is discovering one lender who has been lapping loans for years, a rash of large undetected counterfeit checks, a burst of stolen or counterfeit convenience checks for your home equity lines, a spate of account takeovers, or a collusive ring to target your credit card portfolio with a bust-out scheme to incur multi-million dollar losses this week. I've heard the following a lot, "For the last four few years we keep getting hit with extraordinary losses". When does extraordinary become ordinary?

So what is the value of fraud prevention? Detecting fraud in a timely manner means far lower losses. It means ridding yourself of a bad employee before losses run to the thousands, let alone millions. Detecting counterfeits, collusive networks, etc., before value transfer means avoiding losses entirely or incurring minimal losses. There's an old saying that "preventing losses is far easier than chasing money that has already left the bank". It's also more economical – fewer cases mean fewer investigators trying to recover funds that have left the bank. Working fraud alerts is far more efficient than conducting long, drawn out investigations. It results in better customer service when you proactively protect accounts against fraud. It means lower attrition because customers who have experienced fraud on their accounts (even though you made them whole financially) have lost confidence in your bank, and leave for another institution.

The value of effective fraud prevention has many components... lack of fraud prevention leads to enormous risk.

Do you agree? Please share your perspective.


Make a Comment

* = Required
*
*
*
*
 

Recent Comments:

Peter Goldmann
June 2, 2009 - 12:08 PM
"If anyone DOES disagree with this post, I for one would be extremely interested in their logic. It is painfully true that banks (as well as many non-financial organizations) tend to wait until their fraud losses are no longer extraordinary, but become ordinary. By then multi-millions may have been lost to the "bad guys". Even more amazing is the short-sightedness of many C-suites and boards with regard to the effort and investment needed to achieve a significant reduction in fraud losses and risk. You don't have to be a New York mega-bank to put effective anti-fraud controls in place. Many of these can be implemented with minimal or no cost--it's often a case of changing a process from one that offers fraudsters the opportunity to steal and one that doesn't. Then there's fraud training for employees which for minimal expense can equip them with the knowledge they need to call that hotline that's been sitting idle on someone's desk for months and months. Doing these and other things to deter fraudsters IS a strong value proposition. Waiting until your bank's name hits the front page of the newspaper because some not-that-bright criminal found a way to perpetrate a counterfeit check, credit card or loan fraud scheme is NOT. "
W Brown
July 27, 2009 - 7:44 AM
"I agree with the points made, in my experience c-level execs and boards need to revise their thinking on fraud prevention. Some financial institutions, from SMEs to larger corporations tend to take the short-term view of regarding fraud prevention as a cost to the business, rather than prevention is better than a cure. Reputational damage for a bank is a huge concern, but I think that Hubris has a lot to do with it. The current global financial downturn has burst a lot of bubbles, thus putting even greater strain upon financial institutions to increase their revenue and market share. No board takes kindly to a compliance or risk specialist telling them that they need to spend money on a fraud prevention strategy, the recent RBS meltdown is a good example. It appears to me that some businesses use the "there for the grace of god" approach to fraud prevention, then worry about things when it's to late. "